Search

Recent Articles

IJMPO—A Journey of a Thousand Miles

Author : Padmaj S. Kulkarni

Coronavirus Disease 2019 Treatment—T-Cells Hold the Key in Severe Cases

Author : Kunal Das, Nitika Agrawal, Mansi Kala, Rakhee Khanduri

Why Is China Importing COVID-19 Vaccine Now?

Author : Purvish M. Parikh

Spectrum of Somatic Malignancy in Testicular Germ Cell Tumors—A Histopathological Review of 25 Cases with Clinical Outcome

CC BY 4.0 · Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2025; 46(02): 174-182

DOI: DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1788307

Abstract

Introduction : Germ cell tumors (GCTs) are the commonest testicular malignancy in young males. These tumors are highly chemoresponsive, however become resistant to conventional therapy when a somatic-type malignancy (SM) develops, which happens in ∼3 to 6% of the cases.

Materials and Methods : We reviewed the histologic profile of all cases of testicular/retroperitoneal GCT with SM, diagnosed over a period of 12 years in our institute. Correlation of histologic profile with clinical outcome was done wherever feasible.

Results: A total of 25 cases of testicular/retroperitoneal GCT with SM were identified for review. The histological spectrum of SMs included carcinoma (n = 9), sarcoma (n = 9), embryonic-type neuroectodermal tumor (ENET) (n = 4), and other rare histological types (n = 3). SMs were frequently seen at the resected metastatic sites (n = 13) and in postchemotherapy setting (n = 12); 14 cases had concurrent GCT and SM at the time of diagnosis/initial resection and 9 cases presented as late relapses (more than 2 years after initial presentation). Four patients were treated with metastasectomy and lymph node dissection, six patients were treated with combined resection and chemotherapy, and nine patients were treated with only adjuvant chemotherapy. The patients with SM confined to testis and those treated with multimodality approach had relatively better outcome.

Conclusion : GCTs with SM are a highly heterogeneous group of tumors with varying histologic types and management strategies. Strict adherence to histological diagnostic criteria, differentiating these tumors from close mimics such as glandular and sarcomatoid yolk sac tumors, teratomatous overgrowth, and a new second primary somatic tumor are important due to implications in management and prognosis.

Keywords

Publication History

Article published online:
14 August 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

We recommend

Abstract

Introduction : Germ cell tumors (GCTs) are the commonest testicular malignancy in young males. These tumors are highly chemoresponsive, however become resistant to conventional therapy when a somatic-type malignancy (SM) develops, which happens in ∼3 to 6%. of the cases.

Materials and Methods : We reviewed the histologic profile of all cases of testicular/retroperitoneal GCT with SM, diagnosed over a period of 12 years in our institute. Correlation of histologic profile with clinical outcome was done wherever feasible.

Results: A total of 25 cases of testicular/retroperitoneal GCT with SM were identified for review. The histological spectrum of SMs included carcinoma (n = 9), sarcoma (n = 9), embryonic-type neuroectodermal tumor (ENET) (n = 4), and other rare histological types (n = 3). SMs were frequently seen at the resected metastatic sites (n = 13) and in postchemotherapy setting (n = 12); 14 cases had concurrent GCT and SM at the time of diagnosis/initial resection and 9 cases presented as late relapses (more than 2 years after initial presentation). Four patients were treated with metastasectomy and lymph node dissection, six patients were treated with combined resection and chemotherapy, and nine patients were treated with only adjuvant chemotherapy. The patients with SM confined to testis and those treated with multimodality approach had relatively better outcome.

Conclusion : GCTs with SM are a highly heterogeneous group of tumors with varying histologic types and management strategies. Strict adherence to histological diagnostic criteria, differentiating these tumors from close mimics such as glandular and sarcomatoid yolk sac tumors, teratomatous overgrowth, and a new second primary somatic tumor are important due to implications in management and prognosis.

Keywords

  Fig 1: Adenocarcinoma with mucinous columnar cells in glandular and papillary architecture (A). The cells show nuclear stratification and atypia with frequent mitoses (B). Tumor cells are negative for SALL4 (C), positive for SATB2 (D) and CK20 (E). The case of clear cell renal cell carcinoma composed of nests of clear cells with low nuclear grade (F).


Among the sarcoma group, seven cases were RMS (7/9) and two cases were high-grade spindle cell sarcoma, NOS (2/9). All RMSs were of embryonal subtype with an appreciable number of rhabdomyoblasts; showed positivity for desmin (focal), myogenin, and/or myoD1.

The two sarcoma, NOS cases did not show any line of differentiation by immunohistochemistry (smooth muscle, skeletal muscle, and neural lineage markers were negative). The cases showed sheets and vague fascicles of spindle cells with significant nuclear atypia and frequent mitoses ([Fig. 2]). The tumor was small in one case, measuring 0.8 cm in diameter and was confined to testis; the patient underwent RPLND and no adjuvant chemotherapy was given and patient is disease free 6 months after diagnosis. The other case presented as late relapse in RPLN had disease progression despite second-line chemotherapy.

  Fig 2 : Carcinosarcoma with nests of clear epithelioid cells and atypical spindle cells around the nests (A). Central blood vessel and multinucleate giant cell can be seen in the center of the epithelioid cell nests (inset). Teratoid Wilms' tumor with nests and sheets of blastemal cells, epithelial tubular elements, and intimately admixed mature glial tissue (B). Sarcoma, NOS with sheets of mitotically active atypical spindle cells (C); the tumor cells are negative for glypican 3 (D) and desmin (E).


In the ENET group (n = 4), the tumor was confined to testis in two cases; was seen in both testis and RPLN in one case and in the other case, it was seen as a late relapse in RPLN. The tumor cells were positive for SOX11 and negative for SALL4 and YST markers; showed variable immunopositivity for synaptophysin, chromogranin, CD56, and S100. NKX2–2 and GFAP were negative in the cases tested ([Fig. 3]). EWSR1 break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was negative in one case tested for. All except one patient responded well to chemotherapy.


  Fig 3 : Embryonic-type neuroectodermal tumor composed of sheets and nests of monomorphic round cells with scant cytoplasm and fine granular chromatin (A, B). Tumor cells are negative for NKX2–2 (C), diffusely positive for S100 (D) and SOX11 (E). Staining for OCT 3/4 is negative (F).


Cases with Unusual Histological Features

The case of carcinosarcoma showed intimately admixed epithelial and sarcomatous components, seen in primary site and RPLN. In testis, sarcomatous component was dominant, composed of sheets and vague fascicles of atypical spindle cells with frequent mitosis along with small nests of epithelial cells with clear cytoplasm. At places epithelial cells were seen condensed around thin-walled blood vessels ([Fig. 2]). In RPLN, epithelial component was prominent and showed features of adenocarcinoma, NOS with infiltrating, irregular angulated atypical glands. Immunostains for SALL4, OCT3/4, desmin, CD34, and inhibin were negative in both epithelial and spindle cell components. The residual GCT component present was a small focus of YST in the RPLN.

In the case of triphasic Wilms' tumor we encountered, there was intimately admixed glial elements, seen along with NSGCT elements, the SM being present at primary site at the time of initial presentation. The tumor showed a predominant blastemal component along with intermingled islands of teratoid/glial elements (mature and immature) in a neuropil-rich matrix ([Fig. 2]).

The case of DSRCT was detected in RPLNs, 2 years following the occurrence of GCT. The tumor showed malignant round cell morphology with fibrous stroma and a polyphenotypic immunoprofile. The tumor cells were immunopositive for AE1/AE3, desmin, WT1, synaptophysin, MIC-2, and FLI1. Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for EWSR1-WT1 and EWSR1-FLI1 gene fusions, both were negative.

An intriguing histological finding we observed in a case of ENET was presence of singly scattered large cells with prominent nuclei amidst malignant round blue cells. The smaller cells were positive for synaptophysin, SALL4, and NKX2.2, and negative for desmin, myogenin, calretinin, and D2–40; the scattered large cells were positive for SALL4, D2–40, and OCT3/4. The tumor had mature teratomatous elements and GCNIS was noted in the adjacent testicular parenchyma. There was no seminoma/YST components. This unusual occurrence of admixed large cells in ENET has not been observed previously, to the best of our knowledge. Considering their immunophenotype we could best regard these cells to be entrapped GCNIS cells.

Outcome Details

Clinical follow-up details were available for 19 patients, 18 patients were alive and 1 was deceased, with mean follow-up duration being 4.88 years (range 0.5–17 years).

Treatment details following the diagnosis of SM were available for 20 patients; 9 patients received only chemotherapy; 5 patients underwent surgical and medical (chemotherapy) management; 4 patients underwent surgical management only; 1 patient was treated with combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy; 1 patient received chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery.

One patient died of surgical complications (post-RPLND) and all other patients were alive for the available follow-up period. Nine patients were disease free and asymptomatic; four patients did not respond well to second-line chemotherapy and had been put on palliative intent management, one patient had stable residual disease after treatment and was being followed up, and four patients had not completed treatment at the time of last follow-up.

Among the patients who had disease progression after second-line therapy (4/19), two were sarcoma (2/4), one DSRCT (1/4), and one ENET (1/4). Other than the testicular ENET, three cases had SM at metastatic sites.

Among the patients treated with surgical resection alone (n = 4) or combined surgical resection and chemotherapy/radiotherapy (n = 7), most showed good response to treatment (8/11) and were disease free; two patients (DSRCT and RMS; both detected in metastatic sites) developed progressive disease despite multimodality management and one patient (RMS detected in RPLN) died due to surgery-related complications. Among the patients treated only with chemotherapy (n = 9), two patients developed progressive disease (sarcoma NOS and ENET with large cells) and one patient had residual disease (adenocarcinoma) after the completion of chemotherapy; three patients are yet to complete the chemotherapy course; two patients were disease free after the completion of treatment; outcome details are not available for a patient.

Discussion

Occurrence of SMs in GCT was described as early as 1946 and included in WHO 2004 under the term “teratoma with somatic-type malignancy”; later renamed “GCTs with somatic type malignancy.”[12] SM is believed to arise from pluripotent germ cells or malignant transformation of teratomatous/yolk-sac elements. Some studies have reported occurrence of SM after chemotherapy, which may be due to its DNA damaging effect.[10] [13] Pathogenetically, SMs retain the characteristic molecular abnormality, isochromosome 12p seen in postpubertal-type GCTs which can be detected as 12p amplification by FISH.[7]

SMs are most frequently encountered in metastatic sites as primary treatment failure or late disease relapses.[14] [15] This finding was reiterated in our study as in nearly 56%. of cases SM was seen in metastatic sites and more than half of the patients had received prior chemotherapy. The overall prevalence of SM was less in our cohort than the 3 to 6%. prevalence observed in most other studies. More cases were identified in the past 5 years in our cohort (17/25), probably due to better understanding of this entity and clearer diagnostic criteria. The histological spectrum of SM described in GCT is diverse (sarcomas, carcinomas of various phenotypes, PNET, glial tumors, and nephroblastomas), sarcomas being the commonest in most series (63%).[5] In our series, we observed an equal occurrence of carcinoma and sarcoma with the next frequent being ENET; some rare tumor types such as nephroblastoma, CCRCC, carcinosarcoma, DSRCT, and neuroendocrine carcinoma were also encountered.

We observed carcinomas more frequently in metastatic sites as late relapses, the commonest type being adenocarcinoma, similar to the observation in various studies.[16] The CCRCC and neuroendocrine carcinoma cases we encountered have been not or only sparsely described in literature, respectively. There has been a single report of papillary renal cell carcinoma arising as SM in RPLNs and no other additional renal tumor types have been described previously.[12] [17] Both these tumors were present only in a small focus in our cases, measuring <1>

The commonest type of sarcoma in our series was embryonal RMS, as reported in studies previously. During the initial screening, we found two cases of rhabdomyomatous overgrowth misdiagnosed as RMS. Rhabdomyomatous overgrowth has been described following chemotherapy and is composed of sheets of maturing skeletal muscle cells without any malignant round cell areas, necrosis, or apoptosis. Hence, detecting immature rhabdomyoblasts or embryonal areas is needed to ascertain a diagnosis of RMS as a SM. In our study, among the RMS group, all except one case showed good response to chemotherapy, with disease-free interval of 1 to 57 months.

The sarcoma, NOS cases did not show any line of differentiation by immunohistochemistry. The closest differential to be considered in such cases is sarcomatoid YST. The sarcomatoid areas in YST can be low or high grade,[18] usually show foci with epithelioid pattern and are immunopositive for SALL4 and glypican 3. Sarcomatoid YST is resistant to platinum-based chemotherapy and has an aggressive clinical course, much like GCT with SM.[14]

The so-called testicular PNETs are distinct from the PNET/Ewings sarcoma of bone and soft tissue. The testicular PNETs are negative for FLI1 and CD99; do not show EWSR1 gene rearrangements, a hallmark of PNET. These tumors are generally confined to testis, frequently contain areas resembling medulloepithelioma, medulloblastoma, and a range of neuroglial tumors.[14] [19] Therefore, these tumors are considered to represent “central” rather than peripheral-type neuroectodermal tumors and have been renamed ENET in the WHO fifth edition.[8] [20] ENETs when confined to testis are increasingly being recognized to have better outcome. In comparison, metastatic ENET may have a poorer outcome, as seen in one of our cases which progressed despite second-line chemotherapy.

One of our cases was diagnosed as DSRCT based on histological and immunohistochemical features, although molecular findings were not supportive. Occurrence of this tumor as a SM has not been described previously.

Most of the SMs are consistently associated with teratoma, hence the need to carefully distinguish these tumors from immature teratomatous elements, benign teratomatous overgrowth, and teratomas showing nuclear atypia. Teratomatous overgrowth and atypia in stromal cells are well known to occur after chemotherapy. Any form of teratomatous overgrowth can mimic disease progression, presenting with increasing size of the mass clinically; however, it does not behave in a malignant fashion. In our review, two cases initially misdiagnosed as SM were reclassified as teratomatous overgrowth after histological review.

As somatic malignant transformation is common in metastatic sites and can present as late relapses,[16] metastasis from a new primary nongerm cell neoplasm becomes a diagnostic consideration. In such instances, young age of the patient, prior history of GCT, presence of 12p gain, and absence of primary tumor after systematic evaluation points to a diagnosis of SM.[5]

The various histotypes of SM and relevant clinical parameters described in the literature with significant case numbers are summarized in [Table 1]. In most studies, poor clinical outcome of GCT with SM was observed only when SM involved metastatic sites.[14] In our series too, most of the patients with SM confined to testis had better outcome with only one patient found to have residual disease posttreatment. Also, some studies have questioned the strict size-based diagnostic criteria for SM, as a case with small focus of ENET (not meeting the 5 mm criteria) presented later with widespread disease.[7] In our series, three cases which had SM occupying less than 1 cm area in slide showed a good outcome, despite the aggressive histological type (neuroendocrine carcinoma, CCRCC, and high-grade sarcoma).

Table 1

Comparison of histological and clinical features among the various studies on SM in the literature

Abbreviations: DSRCT, desmoplastic small round cell tumor; ENET, embryonic-type neuroectodermal tumor; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; GCNIS, germ cell neoplasia in situ; GCT, germ cell tumor; H/O, history of; IHC, immunohistochemistry; LMS, leiomyosarcoma; NA, not available; NOS, not otherwise specified; OGS, osteosarcoma; PNET, peripheral neuroectodermal tumor; RCC, renal cell carcinoma; RMS, rhabdomyosarcoma; SM, somatic-type malignancy; UPS, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma; YST, yolk sac tumor.

Owing to the rarity of these tumors, the current management strategy is very heterogeneous and the decision is on a case-to-case basis. Most large series suggest combining surgical resection with some form of adjuvant chemotherapy decided based on histotype of SM for a sustained response. With the current ease of availability of molecular testing strategies, SMs are being found to harbor mutations in genes such as TP53, RAS which are not usually seen in GCT. Hence, the role of tumor specific (SM type specific) targeted therapy approaches may be evaluated for a possible clinical benefit in this rare disease entity.[7]

Conclusion

SMs arising in testicular GCT are a rare, heterogenous group of tumors histologically, with varying clinical outcomes. SMs arising in metastatic sites and those presenting as late relapses show relatively poor outcome. Small tumors (<1>

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

Our study

Magers et al (2014)[5]

Lobo et al (2022)[7]

Hwang et al (2022)[4]

Scheckel et al (2019)[21]

Sharma et al (2019)[10]

Study overview

Morphology, immunophenotype and outcome

Morphology and immunophenotype

Histological spectrum and molecular features

Histological type and clinical outcome

Management and clinical outcome

Management and clinical outcome

Study period

12 y

23 y, single institution

16 y, two institutions

15 y, single institution

35 y, single institution

18 y, single institution

Number of cases

25

124 cases of testicular GCT (excluded PNET and Wilms)

84 histologically confirmed as SM after IHCs

30 (testicular and primary retroperitoneal GCT)

63 (excluded sarcomatoid YST)

24 (testicular, mediastinal and pineal)

30

No. of cases with SM in testis

13

4

14

22

2

No. of cases with SM in metastatic sites

14

22

41

22

Presence of associated GCT

All except two (one showed only GCNIS and other showed only ENET)

Initial diagnosis of GCT known in 50% patients

Initial diagnosis of GCT established in all cases

All except one case of ENET

Concomitant initial presentation of SM with GCT

14

7 cases

14 (5 were ENET)

12

9

H/O chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy before SM

9

83%

15

35

21

Carcinoma

9 (adenocarcinoma, clear cell RCC, neuroendocrine carcinoma)

44 (adenocarcinoma, carcinoma NOS and sarcomatoid carcinoma)

11 (including papillary RCC, neuroendocrine carcinoma)

21 (adenocarcinoma, carcinoma NOS, neuroendocrine carcinoma)

12 (adenocarcinomas)

3

Sarcoma

9 (RMS, sarcoma NOS)

39 cases (RMS, myxofibrosarcoma, sarcoma NOS, UPS, LMS, OGS, gliosarcoma)

6

21 (RMS, angiosarcoma, sarcoma NOS)

12 (RMS and sarcoma, NOS)

16

ENET

4 (one with scattered SALL4-positive large cells)

8

15

10

Other rare tumor types

Two cases of carcinosarcoma, one case of DSRCT

High-grade glioma

Neuroblastoma, low-grade glial tumor

Nephroblastoma, mixed RMS, and small cell carcinoma

Nephroblastoma

IHC

Relevant markers pertaining to histotype

Reclassification of 37 cases as glandular/sarcomatoid YST

NA

Commonest histological type in metastatic sites

Carcinoma

Adenocarcinoma

Carcinoma

Molecular studies

NA

12p FISH, EWSR1 rearrangement in ENET

NA

Clinical outcome

Carcinoma frequent in late relapses, ENET and sarcoma frequent at initial presentation; SM at metastasis—poor outcome; small SM size (<1>

Sarcomatoid SM more aggressive than glandular SM

Late relapse, high-grade sarcomatous SM, ENET, extragonadal primary predictive of poor outcome

Poor survival in metastatic SM group and carcinoma histological type

Carcinomas had better overall survival compared with sarcoma group

Late relapse had poor outcome


References

  1.  Park JS, Kim J, Elghiaty A, Ham WS. Recent global trends in testicular cancer incidence and mortality. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97 (37) e12390
  2.  Ghazarian AA, Trabert B, Devesa SS, McGlynn KA. Recent trends in the incidence of testicular germ cell tumors in the United States. Andrology 2015; 3 (01) 13-18
  3.  Országhová Z, Kalavska K, Mego M, Chovanec M. Overcoming chemotherapy resistance in germ cell tumors. Biomedicines 2022; 10 (05) 972
  4.  Hwang MJ, Hamza A, Zhang M. et al. Somatic-type malignancies in testicular germ cell tumors: a clinicopathologic study of 63 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2022; 46 (01) 11-17
  5.  Magers MJ, Kao CS, Cole CD. et al. “Somatic-type” malignancies arising from testicular germ cell tumors: a clinicopathologic study of 124 cases with emphasis on glandular tumors supporting frequent yolk sac tumor origin. Am J Surg Pathol 2014; 38 (10) 1396-1409
  6.  Gillessen S, Sauvé N, Collette L. et al; International Germ Cell Cancer Classification Update Consortium. Predicting outcomes in men with metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT): results from the IGCCCG Update Consortium. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39 (14) 1563-1574
  7.  Lobo J, Rodrigues Â, Henrique R. et al. Morphological spectrum and molecular features of somatic malignant transformation in germ cell tumours. Histopathology 2022; 81 (01) 84-98
  8.  Idrees MT, Looijenga LH, Boormans JL, Colecchia M. Teratoma with somatic-type malignancy. In: Urinary and Male Genital Tumours. WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Lyon (France): International Agency for Research on Cancer. 5th ed; 2022
  9.  Ibrahim DY, Sun H. Somatic malignant transformation of a testicular teratoma: a case report and an unusual presentation. Case Rep Pathol 2019; 2019: 5273607
  10.  Sharma A, Alifrangis C, Milic M. et al. Somatic transformation in metastatic testicular germ cell tumours - a different disease entity. Anticancer Res 2019; 39 (09) 4911-4916
  11.  Malagón HD, Valdez AM, Moran CA, Suster S. Germ cell tumors with sarcomatous components: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 46 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2007; 31 (09) 1356-1362
  12.  Mikuz G, Colecchia M. Teratoma with somatic-type malignant components of the testis. A review and an update. Virchows Arch 2012; 461 (01) 27-32
  13.  Bahrami A, Ro JY, Ayala AG. An overview of testicular germ cell tumors. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2007; 131 (08) 1267-1280
  14.  Guo CC, Czerniak B. Somatic-type malignancies in testicular germ cell tumors. Hum Pathol 2022; 127: 123-135
  15.  Washino S, Konishi T, Saito K, Ohshima M, Nakamura Y, Miyagawa T. Two cases of somatic-type malignancy as a very late relapse of testicular cancer successfully managed by surgical resection. J Surg Case Rep 2017; 2017 (11) rjx233
  16.  Kranendonk MEG, Hackeng WM, Offerhaus GJA. et al. The decisive role of molecular pathology in presumed somatic metastases of type II testicular germ cell tumors: report of 2 cases. Diagn Pathol 2020; 15 (01) 99
  17.  Zeh N, Wild PJ, Bode PK. et al. Retroperitoneal teratoma with somatic malignant transformation: a papillary renal cell carcinoma in a testicular germ cell tumour metastasis following platinum-based chemotherapy. BMC Urol 2013; 13: 9
  18.  Acosta AM, Al-Obaidy KI, Sholl LM. et al. Sarcomatoid yolk sac tumor harbors somatic mutations that are otherwise rare in testicular germ cell tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 2022; 46 (05) 701-712
  19.  Murati Amador B, Matoso A. Testicular germ cell tumor showing concurrent PNET and neuroglial neoplasms with wide spectrum of grades. Am J Surg Pathol 2019; 43 (06) 865-867
  20.  Bhoopathi HK, Tanveer N, Naskar S, Gautum HV. Testicular PNET arising in a mixed germ cell tumor: a diagnosis not to be missed. Indian J Surg Oncol 2021; 12 (03) 637-640
  21.  Scheckel CJ, Kosiorek HE, Butterfield R, Ho TH, Hilal T. Germ cell tumors with malignant somatic transformation: a Mayo Clinic experience. [published correction appears in  Oncol Res Treat 2019;42(6):354] Oncol Res Treat 2019; 42 (03) 95-100

Address for correspondence

Santosh Menon, MD
Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute
Mumbai 400012, Maharashtra
India   


Publication History

Article published online:
14 August 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

We recommend

  Fig 1: Adenocarcinoma with mucinous columnar cells in glandular and papillary architecture (A). The cells show nuclear stratification and atypia with frequent mitoses (B). Tumor cells are negative for SALL4 (C), positive for SATB2 (D) and CK20 (E). The case of clear cell renal cell carcinoma composed of nests of clear cells with low nuclear grade (F).


  Fig 2 : Carcinosarcoma with nests of clear epithelioid cells and atypical spindle cells around the nests (A). Central blood vessel and multinucleate giant cell can be seen in the center of the epithelioid cell nests (inset). Teratoid Wilms' tumor with nests and sheets of blastemal cells, epithelial tubular elements, and intimately admixed mature glial tissue (B). Sarcoma, NOS with sheets of mitotically active atypical spindle cells (C); the tumor cells are negative for glypican 3 (D) and desmin (E).


  Fig 3 : Embryonic-type neuroectodermal tumor composed of sheets and nests of monomorphic round cells with scant cytoplasm and fine granular chromatin (A, B). Tumor cells are negative for NKX2–2 (C), diffusely positive for S100 (D) and SOX11 (E). Staining for OCT 3/4 is negative (F).

References

  1.  Park JS, Kim J, Elghiaty A, Ham WS. Recent global trends in testicular cancer incidence and mortality. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97 (37) e12390
  2.  Ghazarian AA, Trabert B, Devesa SS, McGlynn KA. Recent trends in the incidence of testicular germ cell tumors in the United States. Andrology 2015; 3 (01) 13-18
  3.  Országhová Z, Kalavska K, Mego M, Chovanec M. Overcoming chemotherapy resistance in germ cell tumors. Biomedicines 2022; 10 (05) 972
  4.  Hwang MJ, Hamza A, Zhang M. et al. Somatic-type malignancies in testicular germ cell tumors: a clinicopathologic study of 63 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2022; 46 (01) 11-17
  5.  Magers MJ, Kao CS, Cole CD. et al. “Somatic-type” malignancies arising from testicular germ cell tumors: a clinicopathologic study of 124 cases with emphasis on glandular tumors supporting frequent yolk sac tumor origin. Am J Surg Pathol 2014; 38 (10) 1396-1409
  6.  Gillessen S, Sauvé N, Collette L. et al; International Germ Cell Cancer Classification Update Consortium. Predicting outcomes in men with metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT): results from the IGCCCG Update Consortium. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39 (14) 1563-1574
  7.  Lobo J, Rodrigues Â, Henrique R. et al. Morphological spectrum and molecular features of somatic malignant transformation in germ cell tumours. Histopathology 2022; 81 (01) 84-98
  8.  Idrees MT, Looijenga LH, Boormans JL, Colecchia M. Teratoma with somatic-type malignancy. In: Urinary and Male Genital Tumours. WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Lyon (France): International Agency for Research on Cancer. 5th ed; 2022
  9.  Ibrahim DY, Sun H. Somatic malignant transformation of a testicular teratoma: a case report and an unusual presentation. Case Rep Pathol 2019; 2019: 5273607
  10.  Sharma A, Alifrangis C, Milic M. et al. Somatic transformation in metastatic testicular germ cell tumours - a different disease entity. Anticancer Res 2019; 39 (09) 4911-4916
  11.  Malagón HD, Valdez AM, Moran CA, Suster S. Germ cell tumors with sarcomatous components: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 46 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2007; 31 (09) 1356-1362
  12.  Mikuz G, Colecchia M. Teratoma with somatic-type malignant components of the testis. A review and an update. Virchows Arch 2012; 461 (01) 27-32
  13.  Bahrami A, Ro JY, Ayala AG. An overview of testicular germ cell tumors. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2007; 131 (08) 1267-1280
  14.  Guo CC, Czerniak B. Somatic-type malignancies in testicular germ cell tumors. Hum Pathol 2022; 127: 123-135
  15.  Washino S, Konishi T, Saito K, Ohshima M, Nakamura Y, Miyagawa T. Two cases of somatic-type malignancy as a very late relapse of testicular cancer successfully managed by surgical resection. J Surg Case Rep 2017; 2017 (11) rjx233
  16.  Kranendonk MEG, Hackeng WM, Offerhaus GJA. et al. The decisive role of molecular pathology in presumed somatic metastases of type II testicular germ cell tumors: report of 2 cases. Diagn Pathol 2020; 15 (01) 99
  17.  Zeh N, Wild PJ, Bode PK. et al. Retroperitoneal teratoma with somatic malignant transformation: a papillary renal cell carcinoma in a testicular germ cell tumour metastasis following platinum-based chemotherapy. BMC Urol 2013; 13: 9
  18.  Acosta AM, Al-Obaidy KI, Sholl LM. et al. Sarcomatoid yolk sac tumor harbors somatic mutations that are otherwise rare in testicular germ cell tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 2022; 46 (05) 701-712
  19.  Murati Amador B, Matoso A. Testicular germ cell tumor showing concurrent PNET and neuroglial neoplasms with wide spectrum of grades. Am J Surg Pathol 2019; 43 (06) 865-867
  20.  Bhoopathi HK, Tanveer N, Naskar S, Gautum HV. Testicular PNET arising in a mixed germ cell tumor: a diagnosis not to be missed. Indian J Surg Oncol 2021; 12 (03) 637-640
  21.  Scheckel CJ, Kosiorek HE, Butterfield R, Ho TH, Hilal T. Germ cell tumors with malignant somatic transformation: a Mayo Clinic experience. [published correction appears in  Oncol Res Treat 2019;42(6):354] Oncol Res Treat 2019; 42 (03) 95-100