Search

Recent Articles

IJMPO—A Journey of a Thousand Miles

Author : Padmaj S. Kulkarni

Coronavirus Disease 2019 Treatment—T-Cells Hold the Key in Severe Cases

Author : Kunal Das, Nitika Agrawal, Mansi Kala, Rakhee Khanduri

Why Is China Importing COVID-19 Vaccine Now?

Author : Purvish M. Parikh

Insulinoma-Associated Protein 1 (INSM1) Expression in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Newly Discovered Diagnostic Marker

CC BY 4.0 · Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2024; 45(04): 306-311

DOI: DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1774777

Abstract

Introduction Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are heterogeneous group of neoplasms with relatively low incidence. Diagnosis of NENs requires an integrated approach of histology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular study. In the present study, we evaluated insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) expression in NENs and correlated it with other established neuroendocrine markers.

Materials and Method Retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary care center. Consecutively, 100 cases from year November 2019 to January 2021 were enrolled in the study and all relevant data were noted.

Results The mean (±standard deviation) age of the patients was 55.5 (±10.6) years with a male preponderance. Total 59%- of the tumors were located in the lung of which 67%- were poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma. INSM1 were positive in 97%- cases, while synaptophysin (SYN) in 96%- and chromogranin A (CgA) in 86%-. Correlation of INSM1 expression with SYN and CgA was statistically significant (p-value<0.05). Mean H-score of INSM1 was significantly higher than SYN and CgA and it was statistically significant (p-value<0.001).

Conclusion In the present study, the expression of INSM1 was seen in 97%- cases of NENs. A statistically significant association was found between INSM1 and traditional NE markers. As a nuclear marker it is easy to interpret and it showed higher H-score. We conclude that INSM1 is a highly sensitive marker and recommend to incorporate it in the routine practice to aid in the diagnostic workup. However, a larger cohort is required to establish the organ-specific sensitivity and specificity of INSM1.

Keywords

neuroendocrine neoplasms - insulinoma-associated protein 1 - immunohistochemistry - traditional neuroendocrine markers - H-score


 

Supplementary Material

>Supplementary Material


Publication History

Article published online:

26 September 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.

A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

Abstract

Introduction Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are heterogeneous group of neoplasms with relatively low incidence. Diagnosis of NENs requires an integrated approach of histology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular study. In the present study, we evaluated insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) expression in NENs and correlated it with other established neuroendocrine markers.

Materials and Method Retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary care center. Consecutively, 100 cases from year November 2019 to January 2021 were enrolled in the study and all relevant data were noted.

Results The mean (±standard deviation) age of the patients was 55.5 (±10.6) years with a male preponderance. Total 59%-of the tumors were located in the lung of which 67%-were poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma. INSM1 were positive in 97%-cases, while synaptophysin (SYN) in 96%-and chromogranin A (CgA) in 86%. Correlation of INSM1 expression with SYN and CgA was statistically significant (p-value < 0.05). Mean H-score of INSM1 was significantly higher than SYN and CgA and it was statistically significant (p-value < 0.001).

Conclusion In the present study, the expression of INSM1 was seen in 97%-cases of NENs. A statistically significant association was found between INSM1 and traditional NE markers. As a nuclear marker it is easy to interpret and it showed higher H-score. We conclude that INSM1 is a highly sensitive marker and recommend to incorporate it in the routine practice to aid in the diagnostic workup. However, a larger cohort is required to establish the organ-specific sensitivity and specificity of INSM1.

Introduction

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are heterogeneous group of disorders with varied histological patterns and nomenclature.[1] Recently, the incidence of NENs has been increased from an estimated 1.09 per 100,000 people in 1973 to 6.98 per 100,000 people in 2012 in the United States.[2] According to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results[3] and Indian[4] data more than 60%-of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) arise from the gastroenteropancreatic NETs (GEP-NETs). Clinical course of NENs is different and depends upon the location of the tumor; however, a significant number of patients can present with advanced stage.[5] All NENs share a common neuroendocrine origin and have varied organ-specific characteristics, biological behavior, prognosis, and treatment.[5] Diagnosis of NENs requires an integrated approach of pathological, immunohistochemical, genetic, and molecular markers.[5]

Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) is a zinc-finger transcription factor which has a key role in the development of neuroendocrine differentiation in various tissues.[6] Insulinoma-associated-1gene encodes the INSM1, which was first discovered in 1992 at the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, Maryland, United States) in human pancreatic insulinoma tissue and murine insulinoma cell lines.[7] Rosenbaum et al[8] reported, INSM1 as a robust immunohistochemical marker of neuroendocrine differentiation in normal and neoplastic human tissue. INSM1 is the first and the most widely validated pan-neuroendocrine marker which shows nuclear positivity.

There is a paucity of Indian literature on this new and emerging marker. In the present study, we will investigate the expression of INSM1 in NENs and compare it with the already established neuroendocrine markers.

Materials and Methods

Sample size and study design: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study done at the department of oncopathology in a tertiary cancer center. Consecutive 100 cases of confirmed NENs from November 2019 to January 2021 were enrolled in the study.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria: Immunohistochemically proven cases of NENs were included in the study. Tumors showing neuroendocrine differentiation without immunohistochemical confirmation and inadequate tissue, suspicious lesions, and cytologically diagnosed cases were excluded.

Demographic details were retrieved from the hospital database. All tissues were fixed in 10%-buffered formalin and processed for hematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemical study. NENs are classified according to the World Health Organization classification.[9] Immunostaining using synaptophysin (SYN) (SP11, monoclonal antibody, Thermoscientific, 1:50), chromogranin A (CgA) (LK2H10, monoclonal antibody, Thermoscientific, 1:100), and INSM1 (clone: MRQ-70, rabbit monoclonal antibody, Cell Marque, 1:50) antibodies were done on all cases. Nuclear immunoreactivity for INSM1 and cytoplasmic stain for SYN and CgA in tumor cells were considered positive. For all markers, both the percentage of cells and intensity of immunoreactivity were noted. H-score assessment was done for INSM1, SYN, and CgA.[10] [11] [12]

Statistical Analysis

Age, sex, location of tumor, histologic type, and histological grade were noted. Associations between categorical variables (location of tumor, tumor subtype, tumor grade) were analyzed using chi-square test. Wilcoxon rank test was used for comparison of H-score value. Two-sided p-values of < 0.05 were considered significant. All statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS 20.

Ethics: The institutional review committee of the Gujarat Cancer and Research Institute approved the study, approval number IRC/35/2019 and date November 14, 2019. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Results

Clinicohistopathological and immunohistochemical characteristics are described in [Table 1]. The mean (±standard deviation [SD]) age was 55.5 (±10.61) years ranging from 25 to 76 years with most of the cases between 51 and 60 years (37%). Male preponderance was noted with male-to-female ratio of 4.2:1. Lung was the most frequently affected organ (59%). Total 67%-cases had poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (PD-NEC) of which 65%-had small cell morphology. Total 43%-of cases had a maximum tumor size of > 7 cm. Total 97 cases were positive for INSM1. Of three negative cases, two were PD-NEC of the lung and one was jejunum well-differentiated NET. Of these three negative INSM1 cases, one case was positive for both SYN and CgA, while two were positive of SYN and CgA, respectively.

Table 1

Clinicopathological and immunohistochemical characteristics

Abbreviations: GIT, gastrointestinal tract; INSM1, insulinoma-associated protein 1; LCNEC, large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma; MINEN, mixed neuroendocrine nonneuroendocrine neoplasms; NEC, neuroendocrine carcinoma; NET, neuroendocrine tumor; SMCC, small cell carcinoma.


Correlation of Expression of INSM1 with Tumor Characteristics

Association between various variables is described in [Table 2]. INSM1 expression was compared with size, site, histological type, histological grade, histological subtypes, and immunohistochemical markers. Statistically significant association was found between the expression of INSM1 and SYN and CgA (p-value < 0.05). However, no statistically significant association was found between histological type, histological grade, and histological subtypes (p-value > 0.05). Comparison of INSM1 with traditional NE markers is shown in [Supp. Figs. S1] and [S2].

Parameters

Number of cases (n = 100)

Age

 < 50>

33

 ≥ 50 y

67

Site

 Lung

59

 GIT + pancreas

31

 Others

10

Sex

 Male

81

 Female

19

Types

 NET

29

 NEC

67

 Combined

4

Subtypes

 NET

 NET 1

16

 NET2

5

 NET3

8

 MINEN

1

 NEC

 SMCC

65

 LCNEC

2

 Combined

3

Immunohistochemistry

Synaptophysin

 Positive

96

 Negative

04

Chromogranin

 Positive

86

 Negative

14

INSM1

 Positive

97

 Negative

03

Table 2

Correlation of INSM1 with clinicopathological variable

Abbreviations: CgA, chromogranin A; GIT, gastrointestinal tract; INSM1, insulinoma-associated protein 1; NEC, neuroendocrine carcinoma; NET, neuroendocrine tumor; SYN, synaptophysin.

a Chi-square test.

Comparisons of H-Scores

Detailed site-specific H-score calculation for all three antibodies is discussed in [Table 3]. Minimum and maximum H-score for all three antibodies was 0 and 300, respectively. Mean (±SD) H-score of SYN, CgA, and INSM1 was 119.65 (±78.706), 108.70 (±99.307), and 194.55 (77.818), respectively. Comparison of H-score is described in [Table 4].

Variables

Total cases

Number of cases (%)

p-Value[a]

INSM1

positive

INSM1 negative

Histological types

 NET

 NEC

 Combined

29

28 (96.6)

1 (3.4)

00591

67

65 (97.0)

2 (3.0)

4

4 (100)

0 (0)

Site

 Lung

 GIT and pancreas

 Others

59

57 (96.6)

2 (3.4)

0.841

31

30 (96.8)

1 (3.2)

10

10 (100)

0 (0)

SYN

 Positive

 Negative

96

94 (97.9)

2 (2.1)

0.008

4

3 (75)

1 (25)

CgA

 Positive

 Negative

86

83 (96.5)

3 (3.5)

0.011

14

14 (100)

0 (0)

Table 3

H-score comparison of SYN, CgA, and INSM1 by location of tumor

Abbreviations: BOT, base of tongue; CgA, chromogranin A; GIT, gastrointestinal tract; INSM1, insulinoma-associated protein 1; LCNEC, large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma; NET, neuroendocrine tumor; SMCC, small cell carcinoma; SYN, synaptophysin; UB, urinary bladder.

Tumor type

Antibodies

Positive cases

H-score

(mean)

GIT

SYN

21/21

135

CHR

18/21

128

INSM1

21/21

188

Pancreaticobiliary system

SYN

9/10

144

CHR

10/10

167

INSM1

10/10

206

Lung NET

SYN

3/3

58

CHRO

3/3

85

INSM1

3/3

170

Lung SMCC

SYN

48/51

103

CHR

43/51

80

INSM1

49/51

194

Lung LCNEC

SYN

1/1

80

CHR

0/1

0

INSM1

1/1

270

Nasal cavity

SYN

1/1

90

CHR

0/1

0

INSM1

1/1

90

BOT

SYN

1/1

80

CHR

1/1

120

INSM1

1/1

190

Presternal

SYN

1/1

185

CHR

1/1

250

INSM1

1/1

160

UB

SYN

1/1

200

CHR

1/1

190

INSM1

1/1

260

Cervix

SYN

5/5

163

CHR

4/5

74

INSM1

5/5

198

Vault

SYN

1/1

285

CHR

1/1

175

INSM1

1/1

300

Table 4

H-score comparison

Abbreviations: CgA, chromogranin A; INSM1, insulinoma-associated protein 1; SYN, synaptophysin.

a Wilcoxon rank test.

Discussion

NET is a relatively rare disorder and its diagnosis requires an integrated approach. Well-established neuroendocrine markers such as SYN, CgA, and CD56 are cytoplasmic markers and it is difficult to interpret them in small biopsy. In our study, we have evaluated the newly evolved marker INSM1 and compared it with various parameters which are statistically not significant. Our findings are concordant with McHugh et al.[13] In their study they have compared INSM1 in GEP-NENs. Total 97%-cases were positive for INSM1, which was higher than the traditional NE markers. Correlation of expression of INSM1 with SYN and CgA showed statistically significant association in our study (p-value < 0.05). Rooper et al[14] studied INSM1 in all thoracic NETs and they have found statistically significant association of INSM1 with SYN and CgA (p-value < 0.001), which was concordant with our study. However, Zou et al[15] did not find statistically significant association of INSM1 with CgA and SYN (p-value < 0.09 and 0.494, respectively). In our study, sensitivity of INSM1, SYN, and CgA were 97, 96, and 86%, respectively. Comparison of sensitivity of INSM1 and conventional marker of previous study is discussed in [Table 5].

Parameters

Number

p-Value[a]

SYN vs. INSM1

 SYN < INSM1

 SYN > INSM1

 SYN = INSM1

79

0.001

18

3

CgA vs. INSM1

 CgA < INSM1

 CgA > INSM1

 SYN = INSM1

76

0.001

21

3

SYN vs. CgA

 SYN < CgA

 SYN > CgA

 SYN = CgA

53

0.195

46

1

Table 5

Comparison of expression of NE markers with previous study

Abbreviations: CgA, chromogranin A; INSM1, insulinoma-associated protein 1; NE, neuroendocrine; SYN, synaptophysin.

In our study, we evaluated INSM1 and other conventional NE markers by calculating H-scores. The mean H-scores of INSM1, SYN, and CgA in our study were 194.5, 119.6, and 108.7, respectively. This is slightly lower than the study by Fujino et al.[16] In their study, the mean H-scores were 211, 191, and 122, respectively. However, in our study comparison of INSM1 H-score with traditional NE markers was statistically significant. This result was concordant with the study of Fujino et al[16] (p-value < 0.0001).

Conclusion

INSM1 is a superior immunohistochemical marker when compared with traditional NE markers (SYN and CgA). Statistically significant association was found between expression of INSM1 and SYN and CgA. However, larger prospective studies should be undertaken to assess the site-based INSM1 expression as well as to investigate the role of INSM1 in prognosis of NEN.

Studies

INSM1 (%)

SYN (%)

CgA (%)

Our study

97/100 (97)

96/100 (96)

86/100 (86)

Fujino et al[16]

100/102 (98)

88/102 (86.2)

84/102 (82.3)

Rosenbaum et al[8]

27/30 (90)

29/30 (96.7)

21/30 (70)

Aldera et al[17]

59/69 (85.5)

63/69 (91.3)

48/69 (69.5)

McHugh et al[13]

89/110 (82.9)

109/110 (99.1)

96/110 (87.3)

Mukhopadhyay et al[6]

144/152 (95)

147/150 (98)

125/149 (84)

Kriegsmann et al[18]

276/372 (74.2)

319/372 (85.8)

289/372 (77.7)

Rooper et al[14]

99/103 (96.1)

79/103 (76.7)

67/103 (65.0)

Sakakibara et al[19]

120/141 (85.1)

87/141 (61.7)

74/141 (52.5)

González et al[20]

32/32 (100)

32/32 (100)

31/32 (97)

References

  1.  Basu B, Sirohi B, Corrie P. Systemic therapy for neuroendocrine tumours of gastroenteropancreatic origin. Endocr Relat Cancer 2010; 17 (01) R75-R90
  2.  Desari A, Shen C, Halperin D. et al. Trends in incidence, prevalence and survival outcomes in patients with neuroendocrine tumours in the United States. JMMA Oncol 2017; 3 (10) 1335-1342
  3.  Lawrence B, Gustafsson BI, Chan A, Svejda B, Kidd M, Modlin IM. The epidemiology of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2011; 40 (01) 1-18 , vii
  4.  Amarapurkar DN, Juneja MP, Patel ND, Amarapurkar AD, Amarapurkar PD. A retrospective clinico-pathological analysis of neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Trop Gastroenterol 2010; 31 (02) 101-104
  5.  Kyriakopoulos G, Mavroeidi V, Chatzellis E, Kaltsas GA, Alexandraki KI. Histopathological, immunohistochemical, genetic and molecular markers of neuroendocrine neoplasms. Ann Transl Med 2018; 6 (12) 252-264
  6.  Mukhopadhyay S, Dermawan JK, Lanigan CP, Farver CF. Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) is a sensitive and highly specific marker of neuroendocrine differentiation in primary lung neoplasms: an immunohistochemical study of 345 cases, including 292 whole-tissue sections. Mod Pathol 2019; 32 (01) 100-109
  7.  Goto Y, De Silva MG, Toscani A, Prabhakar BS, Notkins AL, Lan MS. A novel human insulinoma-associated cDNA, IA-1, encodes a protein with “zinc-finger” DNA-binding motifs. J Biol Chem 1992; 267 (21) 15252-15257
  8.  Rosenbaum JN, Guo Z, Baus RM, Werner H, Rehrauer WM, Lloyd RV. Lloyd RV. INSM1: a novel immunohistochemical and molecular marker for neuroendocrine and neuroepithelial neoplasms. Am J Clin Pathol 2015; 144 (04) 579-591
  9.  Rindi G, Klimstra DS, Abedi-Ardekani B. et al. A common classification framework for neuroendocrine neoplasms: an International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and World Health Organization (WHO) expert consensus proposal. Mod Pathol 2018; 31 (12) 1770-1786
  10.  McCarty Jr KS, Miller LS, Cox EB, Konrath J, McCarty Sr KS. Estrogen receptor analyses. Correlation of biochemical and immunohistochemical methods using monoclonal antireceptor antibodies. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1985; 109 (08) 716-721
  11.  McCarty Jr KS, Szabo E, Flowers JL. et al. Use of a monoclonal anti-estrogen receptor antibody in the immunohistochemical evaluation of human tumors. Cancer Res 1986; 46 (8, Suppl): 4244s-4248s
  12.  Tadrous P.J.. 2007. “Breast” in Diagnostic Criteria Handbook in HISTOPATHOLOGY: A Surgical Pathology Vade Mecum. John Wiley & Sons; England: pp. 258-266
  13.  McHugh KE, Mukhopadhyay S, Doxtader EE, Lanigan C, Allende DS. INSM1 is highly specific marker of neuroendocrine differentiation in primary neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract, appendix and pancreas. Am J Clin Pathol 2020; 153 (06) 811-820
  14.  Rooper LM, Sharma R, Li QK, Illei P, Westra WH. INSM1 demonstrates superior performance to the individual and combined use of synaptophysin, chromogranin and CD56 for diagnosing neuroendocrine tumours of the thoracic cavity. Am J Surg Pathol 2017;00:000–000
  15.  Zou Q, Zhang L, Cheng Z, Guo X, Cao D. INSM1 is less sensitive but more specific than synaptophysin in gynaecological high grade neuroendocrine carcinoma: an immunohistochemical study of 75 cases with specificity test and literature review. Am J Surg Pathol 2021; 45 (02) 147-159
  16.  Fujino K, Yasufuku K, Kudoh S. et al. INSM1 is the best marker for the diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumors: comparison with CGA, SYP and CD56. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2017; 10 (05) 5393-5405
  17.  Aldera AP, Govender D, Locketz ML, Mukhopadhyay S, McHugh K, Allende D. Combined use of INSM1 and synaptophysin is the most sensitive and specific panel to detect neuroendocrine neoplasm in digestive tract. Am J Clin Pathol 2020; 154 (06) 870-871
  18.  Kriegsmann K, Zgorzelski C, Kazdal D. et al. Insulinoma-associated protein 1(INSM1) in thoracic tumour is less sensitive but more specific compared with synaptophysin, chromogranin A and CD56. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2020; 28 (03) 237-242
  19.  Sakakibara R, Kobayashi M, Takahashi N. et al. Insulinoma associated protein 1 (INSM1) is a better marker for diagnosis and prognosis estimation of small cell lung carcinoma than neuroendocrine phenotype markers such as chromogranin A, synaptophysin, and CD 56. Am J Surg Pathol 2020; 44 (06) 757-764
  20.  González I, Lu H-C, Sninsky J. et al. Insulinoma-associated protein 1 expression in primary and metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gastrointestinal and pancreaticobiliary tracts. Histopathology 2019; 75 (04) 568-577

Address for correspondence

Sangita A. Vanik, DM Oncopathology
Department of Oncopathology, The Gujarat Cancer and Research Institute
Ahmedabad, Gujarat
India   


Publication History

Article published online:
26 September 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India


References

  1.  Basu B, Sirohi B, Corrie P. Systemic therapy for neuroendocrine tumours of gastroenteropancreatic origin. Endocr Relat Cancer 2010; 17 (01) R75-R90
  2.  Desari A, Shen C, Halperin D. et al. Trends in incidence, prevalence and survival outcomes in patients with neuroendocrine tumours in the United States. JMMA Oncol 2017; 3 (10) 1335-1342
  3.  Lawrence B, Gustafsson BI, Chan A, Svejda B, Kidd M, Modlin IM. The epidemiology of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2011; 40 (01) 1-18 , vii
  4.  Amarapurkar DN, Juneja MP, Patel ND, Amarapurkar AD, Amarapurkar PD. A retrospective clinico-pathological analysis of neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Trop Gastroenterol 2010; 31 (02) 101-104
  5.  Kyriakopoulos G, Mavroeidi V, Chatzellis E, Kaltsas GA, Alexandraki KI. Histopathological, immunohistochemical, genetic and molecular markers of neuroendocrine neoplasms. Ann Transl Med 2018; 6 (12) 252-264
  6.  Mukhopadhyay S, Dermawan JK, Lanigan CP, Farver CF. Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) is a sensitive and highly specific marker of neuroendocrine differentiation in primary lung neoplasms: an immunohistochemical study of 345 cases, including 292 whole-tissue sections. Mod Pathol 2019; 32 (01) 100-109
  7.  Goto Y, De Silva MG, Toscani A, Prabhakar BS, Notkins AL, Lan MS. A novel human insulinoma-associated cDNA, IA-1, encodes a protein with “zinc-finger” DNA-binding motifs. J Biol Chem 1992; 267 (21) 15252-15257
  8.  Rosenbaum JN, Guo Z, Baus RM, Werner H, Rehrauer WM, Lloyd RV. Lloyd RV. INSM1: a novel immunohistochemical and molecular marker for neuroendocrine and neuroepithelial neoplasms. Am J Clin Pathol 2015; 144 (04) 579-591
  9.  Rindi G, Klimstra DS, Abedi-Ardekani B. et al. A common classification framework for neuroendocrine neoplasms: an International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and World Health Organization (WHO) expert consensus proposal. Mod Pathol 2018; 31 (12) 1770-1786
  10.  McCarty Jr KS, Miller LS, Cox EB, Konrath J, McCarty Sr KS. Estrogen receptor analyses. Correlation of biochemical and immunohistochemical methods using monoclonal antireceptor antibodies. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1985; 109 (08) 716-721
  11.  McCarty Jr KS, Szabo E, Flowers JL. et al. Use of a monoclonal anti-estrogen receptor antibody in the immunohistochemical evaluation of human tumors. Cancer Res 1986; 46 (8, Suppl): 4244s-4248s
  12.  Tadrous P.J.. 2007. “Breast” in Diagnostic Criteria Handbook in HISTOPATHOLOGY: A Surgical Pathology Vade Mecum. John Wiley & Sons; England: pp. 258-266
  13.  McHugh KE, Mukhopadhyay S, Doxtader EE, Lanigan C, Allende DS. INSM1 is highly specific marker of neuroendocrine differentiation in primary neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract, appendix and pancreas. Am J Clin Pathol 2020; 153 (06) 811-820
  14.  Rooper LM, Sharma R, Li QK, Illei P, Westra WH. INSM1 demonstrates superior performance to the individual and combined use of synaptophysin, chromogranin and CD56 for diagnosing neuroendocrine tumours of the thoracic cavity. Am J Surg Pathol 2017;00:000–000
  15.  Zou Q, Zhang L, Cheng Z, Guo X, Cao D. INSM1 is less sensitive but more specific than synaptophysin in gynaecological high grade neuroendocrine carcinoma: an immunohistochemical study of 75 cases with specificity test and literature review. Am J Surg Pathol 2021; 45 (02) 147-159
  16.  Fujino K, Yasufuku K, Kudoh S. et al. INSM1 is the best marker for the diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumors: comparison with CGA, SYP and CD56. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2017; 10 (05) 5393-5405
  17.  Aldera AP, Govender D, Locketz ML, Mukhopadhyay S, McHugh K, Allende D. Combined use of INSM1 and synaptophysin is the most sensitive and specific panel to detect neuroendocrine neoplasm in digestive tract. Am J Clin Pathol 2020; 154 (06) 870-871
  18.  Kriegsmann K, Zgorzelski C, Kazdal D. et al. Insulinoma-associated protein 1(INSM1) in thoracic tumour is less sensitive but more specific compared with synaptophysin, chromogranin A and CD56. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2020; 28 (03) 237-242
  19.  Sakakibara R, Kobayashi M, Takahashi N. et al. Insulinoma associated protein 1 (INSM1) is a better marker for diagnosis and prognosis estimation of small cell lung carcinoma than neuroendocrine phenotype markers such as chromogranin A, synaptophysin, and CD 56. Am J Surg Pathol 2020; 44 (06) 757-764
  20.  González I, Lu H-C, Sninsky J. et al. Insulinoma-associated protein 1 expression in primary and metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gastrointestinal and pancreaticobiliary tracts. Histopathology 2019; 75 (04) 568-577