Clinicopathological Presentation of Cervical Cancer in Bhopal
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 ? Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2019; 40(S 01): S33-S37
DOI: DOI: 10.4103/ijmpo.ijmpo_185_17
Abstract
Aim:?To study the clinicopathological spectrum of cervical cancers in tertiary care center to assess scenario in Central India.?Materials and Methods:?Retrospective study in the Department of Pathology in our institution to evaluate cases of cervical cancers from January 2014 to August 2015. Histopathological diagnosis was correlated with age, symptoms, gravida, Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging, and other relevant clinical details wherever deemed necessary. The biostatical analysis was performed for quantitative data student?s t-test was applied. P value was considered statistically significant if P < 0 class="b" xss=removed>Results:?A total of 180 cases were of neoplasia cervix. Majority of cases were squamous cell carcinoma type, i.e., 96.6% (174 cases) followed by adenocarcinoma constituting only 2.8% (5 cases) with a mean age of 50.7 years and average gravida of 3.78. Majority of cases (50.01%) complained of postmenopausal bleeding followed by abnormal spotting (26.67%) and lower abdominal pain (7.78%). The most common presentation was in Stage IIB with 45.56% (82) cases.?Conclusion:?Histomorphology remains the mainstay of diagnosis of cervical cancers. In low compliance settings such as ours, colposcopy-guided biopsy is the preferred course of management, especially in elderly females to be definite to rule out or diagnose neoplasia. National level cervical cancer program is immediate need of the hour and should include human papilloma virus vaccine, awareness, and screening programs as well as treatment assistance for low socioeconomic strata.
Publication History
Article published online:
24 May 2021
? 2019. Indian Society of Medical and Paediatric Oncology. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
Abstract
Aim:?To study the clinicopathological spectrum of cervical cancers in tertiary care center to assess scenario in Central India.?Materials and Methods:?Retrospective study in the Department of Pathology in our institution to evaluate cases of cervical cancers from January 2014 to August 2015. Histopathological diagnosis was correlated with age, symptoms, gravida, Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging, and other relevant clinical details wherever deemed necessary. The biostatical analysis was performed for quantitative data student?s t-test was applied. P value was considered statistically significant if P < 0 class="b" xss=removed>Results:?A total of 180 cases were of neoplasia cervix. Majority of cases were squamous cell carcinoma type, i.e., 96.6% (174 cases) followed by adenocarcinoma constituting only 2.8% (5 cases) with a mean age of 50.7 years and average gravida of 3.78. Majority of cases (50.01%) complained of postmenopausal bleeding followed by abnormal spotting (26.67%) and lower abdominal pain (7.78%). The most common presentation was in Stage IIB with 45.56% (82) cases.?Conclusion:?Histomorphology remains the mainstay of diagnosis of cervical cancers. In low compliance settings such as ours, colposcopy-guided biopsy is the preferred course of management, especially in elderly females to be definite to rule out or diagnose neoplasia. National level cervical cancer program is immediate need of the hour and should include human papilloma virus vaccine, awareness, and screening programs as well as treatment assistance for low socioeconomic strata.
Introduction
Cancer of the cervix is a global health problem, especially in developing countries like India where effective screening programs are lacking in planning, organization, and implementation levels.
It is also the fourth most common cause of cancer death (266,000 deaths in 2012) in women worldwide accounting for 7.5% of all female cancer deaths. Almost nine out of 10 (87%) of cervical cancer deaths occur in less developed countries, and more than one-fifth of all new cases are diagnosed in India.[1] Organized population-based screening linked to treatment of the detected neoplasia can lead to more than 70% reduction of disease-related mortality.[2] The mortality and morbidity burden poses a heavy economic burden on families.[3] Mortality due to cervical cancer is also an indicator of health inequities,[4] as 87% of all deaths due to cervical cancer are in developing, low- and middle-income countries.[5]
Cervical cancer prevention programs include a 3-stage intervention: Screening by Pap tests/cervical cytology, colposcopic evaluation of screen positives, and directed biopsy of abnormal looking cervical tissue for diagnosis and excisional or ablative treatment of cervical tissue in women diagnosed with precancerous/cancerous lesions. The incidence of cervical cancer can be decreased by regular screening and treatment of precancerous lesions. Although Pap smear is central to screening, it has some limitations, most important being its limited sensitivity which is between 47% and 62% and the subjective interpretation of the results.[6] Survival rates for cervical cancer can be further improved by establishing effective cancer treatment programs. Cervical cancer is preceded by a long period of premalignant disease with increasing morphological atypia and the potential for progression to malignancy. On an average, cervical cancer takes at least a decade to develop.
The pattern of gynecological malignancies varies among nations and even within health institution in the same country. Understanding the histopathological pattern of these will help in the management of the patient. Therefore, the histopathological examination of the biopsies of cervical lesions is the single best gold standard for the diagnosis of the lesions of the cervix.[7] The aim of the following study is to study cases of cervical cancers. Ours being a tertiary care center with high patient load can give a better picture of the current scenario to give histomorphological spectrum and establish the clinicopathological correlation of cervical cancers in Central India. On the basis of this, a detailed histomorphological study of the neoplastic lesions of the cervix was taken up our institution.
Materials and Methods
All the uterine cervical biopsies and hysterectomy specimens (for cervical lesions) received in our institution were evaluated retrospectively from January 2014 to August 2015. After standard grossing and processing procedure, the tissues were examined in hematoxyline and eosin stained slides and histopathological evaluation was done. The findings were correlated with age, symptoms, gravida, parity and other relevant clinical details wherever deemed necessary. The biostatical analysis was performed using program IBM SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences), for quantitative data student?s t-test was applied. P value was considered statistically significant if?P?< 0 class="i" xss=removed>P?< 0>
Results
A total of 180 cases were of neoplasia cervix. Among all the neoplastic lesions, moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma with 92 (51.11%) cases was the most common histological type of carcinoma encountered in our study followed by Nonkeratinizing Squamous Cell Carcinoma (NKSCC), Well-Differentiated Squamous Cell Carcinoma (WDSCC), Poorly Differentiated Squamous Cell Carcinoma(PDSCC), Adenocarcinoma (AdenoCa), and Adenosquamous carcinoma with 25.56% (46), 11.67% (21), 8.33% (15), 2.78% (5), and 0.56% (1) cases, respectively.
Thus, the majority of cases were of squamous cell carcinoma type, i.e., 96.6% (174 cases) followed by AdenoCa constituting only 2.8% (5 cases). Among 174 squamous cell carcinoma cases, 128 (73.5%) cases were keratinizing and 46 (26.4%) cases constituted nonkeratinizing type.
Regarding age distribution, the mean age for neoplastic lesion was 50.67 years with a high standard deviation of 10.86. Age distribution according to histomorphological diagnosis is shown in [Table 1].
Diagnosis |
Total cases |
Mean age |
Minimum age |
Maximum age |
---|---|---|---|---|
MDSCC ? Moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma; NKSCC ? nonkeratinizing squamous cell carcinoma; WDSCC ? Well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma; PDSCC ? Poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma |
||||
MDSCC |
92 |
50.6 |
30 |
75 |
NKSCC |
46 |
51.0 |
30 |
70 |
WDSCC |
21 |
50.4 |
26 |
66 |
PDSCC |
15 |
52.1 |
30 |
70 |
Adenoca |
5 |
45.8 |
40 |
60 |
Adenosquamous |
1 |
45.0 |
45 |
45 |
Studies (place) |
Time period |
Age range |
Peak decade |
Mean age+SD |
---|---|---|---|---|
SD ? Standard deviation |
||||
Adeniji[14] (Nigeria, Africa) |
1979-1997 |
23-85 |
5th |
51.8 |
Olu-Eddo et al. [8] (Benin, Africa) |
1987-2006 |
15-90 |
5th |
50.4+13.5 |
Okoye[9] (Nigeria, Africa) |
2000-2009 |
18-99 |
5th |
51.5+12.8 |
Jeebun et al.[16] (Mauritius, Africa) |
2000-12 |
- |
5th |
50.6+10.6 |
Abudu et al.[10] (Olabisi, Africa) |
2003-2004 |
31-70 |
4th |
- |
Pathak et al.[11] (Nepal) |
2013 |
24-92 |
4th |
42.5 |
Present study |
2014-2015 |
22-75 |
4th |
50.6+10.8 |
- Incidence/Mortality Data. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C. et al.?GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC Cancer Base No 11 Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013
- Kitchener HC, Castle PE, Cox JT.?Chapter 7: Achievements and limitations of cervical cytology screening. Vaccine 2006; 24 (03) Suppl S3/63-70
- Arrossi S, Matos E, Zengarini N, Roth B, Sankaranayananan R, Parkin M.?The socio-economic impact of cervical cancer on patients and their families in Argentina, and its influence on radiotherapy compliance. Results from a cross-sectional study. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 105: 335-40
- Satija A. Cervical cancer in India. South Asia centre for chronic disease. Available from: http://sancd.org/uploads/pdf/cervical_ cancer.pdf. [Last accessed on 2014 Feb 16].
- Yeole BB, Kumar AV, Kurkure A, Sunny L.?Population-based survival from cancers of breast, cervix and ovary in women in Mumbai, India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2004; 5: 308-15
- Shastri SS, Mittra I, Mishra GA, Gupta S, Dikshit R, Singh S. et al. Effect of VIA Screening by Primary Health Workers: Randomized Controlled Study in Mumbai, India, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2014;106(3). DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju009.
- Mostafa MG, Srivannaboon S, Rachanawutanon M.?Accuracy of cytological findings in abnormal cervical smears by cytohistologic comparison. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2000; 43: 23-9
- Olu-Eddo AN, Ekanem VJ, Umannah I, Onakevhor J.?A 20 year histopathological study of cancer of the cervix in Nigerians. Nig Q J Hosp Med 2011; 21: 149-53
- Okoye CA.?Histopathological pattern of cervical cancer in Benin City, Nigeria. J Med Investig Pract 2014; 9: 147-50
- Abudu EK, Banjo AA, Izegbu MC, Agboola AO, Anunobi CC, Jagun OE.?Histopathological pattern of carcinoma of cervix in Olabisi Onabanjo University Teaching Hospital, Sagamu, Nigeria. NQJHM 2006; 16: 80-4
- Pathak TB, Pun CB, Shrestha S, Bastola S, Bhatta R.?Incidence, trends and histopathological pattern of cervical malignancies at BP koirala memorial cancer hospital Nepal. J Pathol Nepal 2013; 3: 386-9
- Ikechebelu JI, Onyiaorah IV, Ugboaja JO, Anyiam DC, Eleje GU.?Clinicopathological analysis of cervical cancer seen in a tertiary health facility in Nnewi, South-East Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol 2010; 30: 299-301
- Adegoke O, Kulasingam S, Virnig B.?Cervical cancer trends in the United States: A 35-year population-based analysis. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2012; 21: 1031-7
- Adeniji KA.?Analysis of the histopathological pattern of carcinoma of the cervix in Ilorin, Nigeria. Niger J Med 2001; 10: 165-8
- WHO/ICO Information Centre on Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) and Cervical Cancer. (a) Human Papillomavirus and Related Cancers in India. Summary Report; 2009. Available from: http://www.who.int/hpvcentre/en/. [Last accessed on 2015 Nov 25].
- Jeebun N, Agnihotri S, Manraj S, Purwar B. Study of Cervical Cancers in Mauritius Over a Twelve Years Period (1989-2000) and Role of Cervical Screening. The Internet Journal of Oncology 2005:3(2).
- Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P.?Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005; 55: 74-108
- Miller AB, Chamberlain J, Day NE, Hakama M, Prorok PC.?Report on a workshop of the UICC project on evaluation of screening for cancer. Int J Cancer 1990; 46: 761-9
- Miller AB.?Cervical Cancer Screening Programs: Managerial Guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1992
- Bishop A, Sherris J, Tsu VD, Kilbourne-Brook M.?Cervical dysplasia treatment: Key issues for developing countries. Bull Pan Am Health Organ 1996; 30: 378-86
- Kaku M, Mathew A, Rajan B.?Impact of socio-economic factors in delayed reporting and late-stage presentation among patients with cervix cancer in a major cancer hospital in South India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2008; 9: 589-94
- Bosch FX, de Sanjos? S.?Chapter 1: Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer ? Burden and assessment of causality. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2003; 31: 3-13
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (c). Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Genital HPV Infection ? CDC Fact Sheet. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/STD/HPV/STDFact-HPV.htm. [Last accessed on 2009 Dec 25].
- Monsonego J, Bosch FX, Coursaget P, Cox JT, Franco E, Frazer I. et al.?Cervical cancer control, priorities and new directions. Int J Cancer 2004; 108: 329-33
- Soares GR, Vieira Rda R, Pellizzer EP, Miyahara GI.?Indications for the HPV vaccine in adolescents: a review of the literature. J Infect Public Health 2015; 8: 105-16 DOI:?10.1016/j.jiph.2014.08.011.
Address for correspondence
Publication History
Article published online:
24 May 2021
? 2019. Indian Society of Medical and Paediatric Oncology. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
References
- Incidence/Mortality Data. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C. et al.?GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC Cancer Base No 11 Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013
- Kitchener HC, Castle PE, Cox JT.?Chapter 7: Achievements and limitations of cervical cytology screening. Vaccine 2006; 24 (03) Suppl S3/63-70
- Arrossi S, Matos E, Zengarini N, Roth B, Sankaranayananan R, Parkin M.?The socio-economic impact of cervical cancer on patients and their families in Argentina, and its influence on radiotherapy compliance. Results from a cross-sectional study. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 105: 335-40
- Satija A. Cervical cancer in India. South Asia centre for chronic disease. Available from: http://sancd.org/uploads/pdf/cervical_ cancer.pdf. [Last accessed on 2014 Feb 16].
- Yeole BB, Kumar AV, Kurkure A, Sunny L.?Population-based survival from cancers of breast, cervix and ovary in women in Mumbai, India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2004; 5: 308-15
- Shastri SS, Mittra I, Mishra GA, Gupta S, Dikshit R, Singh S. et al. Effect of VIA Screening by Primary Health Workers: Randomized Controlled Study in Mumbai, India, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2014;106(3). DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju009.
- Mostafa MG, Srivannaboon S, Rachanawutanon M.?Accuracy of cytological findings in abnormal cervical smears by cytohistologic comparison. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2000; 43: 23-9
- Olu-Eddo AN, Ekanem VJ, Umannah I, Onakevhor J.?A 20 year histopathological study of cancer of the cervix in Nigerians. Nig Q J Hosp Med 2011; 21: 149-53
- Okoye CA.?Histopathological pattern of cervical cancer in Benin City, Nigeria. J Med Investig Pract 2014; 9: 147-50
- Abudu EK, Banjo AA, Izegbu MC, Agboola AO, Anunobi CC, Jagun OE.?Histopathological pattern of carcinoma of cervix in Olabisi Onabanjo University Teaching Hospital, Sagamu, Nigeria. NQJHM 2006; 16: 80-4
- Pathak TB, Pun CB, Shrestha S, Bastola S, Bhatta R.?Incidence, trends and histopathological pattern of cervical malignancies at BP koirala memorial cancer hospital Nepal. J Pathol Nepal 2013; 3: 386-9
- Ikechebelu JI, Onyiaorah IV, Ugboaja JO, Anyiam DC, Eleje GU.?Clinicopathological analysis of cervical cancer seen in a tertiary health facility in Nnewi, South-East Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol 2010; 30: 299-301
- Adegoke O, Kulasingam S, Virnig B.?Cervical cancer trends in the United States: A 35-year population-based analysis. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2012; 21: 1031-7
- Adeniji KA.?Analysis of the histopathological pattern of carcinoma of the cervix in Ilorin, Nigeria. Niger J Med 2001; 10: 165-8
- WHO/ICO Information Centre on Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) and Cervical Cancer. (a) Human Papillomavirus and Related Cancers in India. Summary Report; 2009. Available from: http://www.who.int/hpvcentre/en/. [Last accessed on 2015 Nov 25].
- Jeebun N, Agnihotri S, Manraj S, Purwar B. Study of Cervical Cancers in Mauritius Over a Twelve Years Period (1989-2000) and Role of Cervical Screening. The Internet Journal of Oncology 2005:3(2).
- Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P.?Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005; 55: 74-108
- Miller AB, Chamberlain J, Day NE, Hakama M, Prorok PC.?Report on a workshop of the UICC project on evaluation of screening for cancer. Int J Cancer 1990; 46: 761-9
- Miller AB.?Cervical Cancer Screening Programs: Managerial Guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1992
- Bishop A, Sherris J, Tsu VD, Kilbourne-Brook M.?Cervical dysplasia treatment: Key issues for developing countries. Bull Pan Am Health Organ 1996; 30: 378-86
- Kaku M, Mathew A, Rajan B.?Impact of socio-economic factors in delayed reporting and late-stage presentation among patients with cervix cancer in a major cancer hospital in South India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2008; 9: 589-94
- Bosch FX, de Sanjos? S.?Chapter 1: Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer ? Burden and assessment of causality. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2003; 31: 3-13
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (c). Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Genital HPV Infection ? CDC Fact Sheet. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/STD/HPV/STDFact-HPV.htm. [Last accessed on 2009 Dec 25].
- Monsonego J, Bosch FX, Coursaget P, Cox JT, Franco E, Frazer I. et al.?Cervical cancer control, priorities and new directions. Int J Cancer 2004; 108: 329-33
- Soares GR, Vieira Rda R, Pellizzer EP, Miyahara GI.?Indications for the HPV vaccine in adolescents: a review of the literature. J Infect Public Health 2015; 8: 105-16 DOI:?10.1016/j.jiph.2014.08.011.