Clinical Profile, Toxicities, and Survival Outcome of MCP841 in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Current Era: A Retrospective Study from Eastern India
CC BY 4.0 · Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2024; 45(06): 509-514
DOI: DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1788703
Abstract
Introduction: The overall survival in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) ranges from 45 to 81% in India. Aggressive chemotherapy protocols like MCP841 have improved the outcome and it can be delivered with minimal supportive care. This study retrospectively analyses the clinical profile and overall survival of patients treated by this protocol.
Objective: This single-center study aims to estimate the event-free survival of patients treated accordingly to the MCP841 protocol with high-dose cytarabine (HDAC) at 2 g/m2 as the backbone, along with the risk-stratified incidence and cause of mortality in childhood ALL.
Material and Methods: Records of 156 patients aged 1 to 19 years, newly diagnosed with ALL from June 2009 to August 2013 who were treated according to the forementioned protocol were analyzed. Risk stratification for both precursor B-cell ALL (B-ALL) and T-cell ALL (T-ALL) was done, followed by an analysis of the correlation of risk-stratified groups with mortality and survival outcomes.
Result: Precursor B-ALL was found in 70% patients (including 69.7% [n = 76] standard risk, 20.1% [n = 22] intermediate risk, and 10% [n = 11] high risk), while 30% had T-ALL (including 74.4% [n = 35] standard risk and 25.5% [n = 12] high risk). Death during induction occurred in 0.04% (n = 5) precursor B-ALL and 23% (n = 11) T-ALL patients. The causes were infection in 62.5%, hemorrhage in 25%, and cortical venous thrombosis in 12.5%. Among those who attained remission (89.7%, n =140), relapse occurred in 26% (n = 27) precursor B-ALL and 28% (n = 10) T-ALL patients. Approximately 31% patients died in the postinduction phase, with progressive disease due to relapse being the most common cause and bone marrow the most common site. Event-free survival at 168 months for overall population, precursor B-ALL, and T-ALL was 59, 62.4, and 51.1%, respectively.
Conclusion: A comparable survival outcome in par with similar centers in developing countries with the MCP841 protocol was found. Infections are a major cause of mortality during treatment, especially when associated with malnourishment. Relapsed disease and poor salvage rates remain a major hurdle to achieving better survival in developing countries; however, better supportive care and infection control measures along with implementing risk-stratified high-dose chemotherapy protocols might improve outcome in the future.
Keywords
acute lymphoblastic leukemia - high-dose cytarabine - MCP841 protocol - retrospective study - survival analysisAuthors' Contribution
S.B. was responsible for the concept, data acquisition, design of intellectual content, literature search, and manuscript editing. S.S. was responsible for manuscript preparation and literature search. D.R. designed the study. K.D. contributed to manuscript review. M.S. contributed to data analysis and manuscript review. This manuscript has been read and approved by all the authors.
Publication History
Article published online:
05 August 2024
© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
- Surveillance and expected outcome of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children and adolescents: An experience from Eastern IndiaAshis Mukhopadhyay, Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology, 2013
- Profile of Pediatric Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in the Era of Imatinib: A Study from South IndiaCatherene Bernard, Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology, 2019
- Chemotherapy Delays Are Associated with Inferior Outcome in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Retrospective Study from a Tertiary Cancer Center in South IndiaVineet Agrawal, Indian J Radiol Imaging, 2021
- Chemotherapy Delays Are Associated with Inferior Outcome in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Retrospective Study from a Tertiary Cancer Center in South IndiaVineet Agrawal, VCOT Open, 2021
- Pancytopenia – (?) An obstacle in the diagnosis and outcome of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemiaShruti Raja, South Asian Journal of Cancer, 2015
- #95: Clinical Profile and Outcome of Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients with Tuberculosis at the Philippine General HospitalMaika Kamille Mortel, Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, 2021
- Mechanisms by Which Obesity Impacts Survival from Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia<svg viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
</svg> Etan Orgel, JNCI Monographs, 2019 - Clinical implications of cytogenetic and molecular analyses of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemiaWilliam M. Crist, STEM CELLS, 1993
- A Study of Incidence of Recurrent Genetic Translocations in Adult and Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) Patients in North India.<svg viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
</svg> N. Varma, International Journal of Epidemiology, 2015 - Disparities in parental distress in a multicenter clinical trial for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemiaPuja J Umaretiya, JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2023
Abstract
Introduction: The overall survival in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) ranges from 45 to 81% in India. Aggressive chemotherapy protocols like MCP841 have improved the outcome and it can be delivered with minimal supportive care. This study retrospectively analyses the clinical profile and overall survival of patients treated by this protocol.Objective: This single-center study aims to estimate the event-free survival of patients treated accordingly to the MCP841 protocol with high-dose cytarabine (HDAC) at 2 g/m2 as the backbone, along with the risk-stratified incidence and cause of mortality in childhood ALL.
Material and Methods: Records of 156 patients aged 1 to 19 years, newly diagnosed with ALL from June 2009 to August 2013 who were treated according to the forementioned protocol were analyzed. Risk stratification for both precursor B-cell ALL (B-ALL) and T-cell ALL (T-ALL) was done, followed by an analysis of the correlation of risk-stratified groups with mortality and survival outcomes.
Result: Precursor B-ALL was found in 70% patients (including 69.7% [n = 76] standard risk, 20.1% [n = 22] intermediate risk, and 10% [n = 11] high risk), while 30% had T-ALL (including 74.4% [n = 35] standard risk and 25.5% [n = 12] high risk). Death during induction occurred in 0.04% (n = 5) precursor B-ALL and 23% (n = 11) T-ALL patients. The causes were infection in 62.5%, hemorrhage in 25%, and cortical venous thrombosis in 12.5%. Among those who attained remission (89.7%, n =140), relapse occurred in 26% (n = 27) precursor B-ALL and 28% (n = 10) T-ALL patients. Approximately 31% patients died in the postinduction phase, with progressive disease due to relapse being the most common cause and bone marrow the most common site. Event-free survival at 168 months for overall population, precursor B-ALL, and T-ALL was 59, 62.4, and 51.1%, respectively.
Conclusion: A comparable survival outcome in par with similar centers in developing countries with the MCP841 protocol was found. Infections are a major cause of mortality during treatment, especially when associated with malnourishment. Relapsed disease and poor salvage rates remain a major hurdle to achieving better survival in developing countries; however, better supportive care and infection control measures along with implementing risk-stratified high-dose chemotherapy protocols might improve outcome in the future.
Keywordsacute lymphoblastic leukemia - high-dose cytarabine - MCP841 protocol - retrospective study - survival analysis
Introduction
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is one of the most common malignancies in children in India with relative proportion varying between 25 and 40%.[1] After the introduction of aggressive chemotherapy protocols like Berlin–Frankfurt–Münster (BFM), remarkable outcome has been seen in the developed countries resulting in cure rate of 80 to 90%.[2] The prognosis of ALL in India remains poor as the overall survival in ALL ranges from 45 to 81%.[3] [4] [5] [6] [7] This can be partly attributed to the logistic constraints to tackle side effects of aggressive protocols and nonadherence to treatment. Aggressive chemotherapy protocols, therapy stratification, and risk-adapted management represent major cornerstones in the treatment of childhood ALL.[8] [9] The MCP841 protocol was developed for low- and middle-income countries as it can be delivered with minimal supportive care.[10]
Initially high-dose cytarabine (HDAC) at the dose of 2 g/m2 were given to those younger than 3 years who could not be given prophylactic cranial radiation. At the Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, HDAC at the dose of 2 g/m2 was given to entire pediatric population, and the 4-year event-free survival (EFS) was reported to be 85.5%, which is at par with the EFS reported in cancer centers in developed countries. The incidence of posttherapy relapse was reported to be 15% in the MCP841 protocol in a study at the same center.[8]
Our primary objective was to study the EFS with HDAC as the backbone of the protocol.
The secondary objectives of the study were to determine the following:
Incidence of precursor B-cell ALL (B-ALL; standard, intermediate, and high risk) and T-cell ALL (T-ALL; standard and high risk) as per the criteria listed in [Table 1].
Incidence and cause of death in various risk groups of ALL.
Statistical correlation of risk stratification with mortality
Drugs |
Induction (I1) |
Induction 2 (I2) |
I2A |
Repeat induction (RI1) |
Consolidation |
Maintenance (6 cycles) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Prednisolone (40 mg/m2) |
D 1–28 |
▪ |
HDAC (2 g/m2) |
Repeat I1 |
D 1–7 |
▪ |
Vincristine (1.4 mg/m2) |
D 1, 8, 15, 22, 29 |
▪ |
D 1, 15 |
D 1 |
||
L-asparaginase (6,000 U/m2) |
D 2–20, alternate day |
▪ |
▪ |
D 1, 3, 5, 7 |
||
Daunorubicin (30 mg/m2) |
D 8, 15, 29 |
▪ |
▪ |
D 1 |
||
Mercaptopurine (75 mg/m2) |
▪ |
Daily |
D 1–7, 15–21 |
Start on day 15. Daily, 3 wk out of every 4 wk, for a total of 12 wk |
||
Cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m2) |
▪ |
D 1, 15 |
D 1, 15 |
▪ |
||
Methotrexate (12 mg, IT) |
D 1, 8, 15, 22 |
D 1, 8, 15, 22 |
▪ |
15 mg/m2, orally, start on D 15, once a week, missing every 4th wk, for a total of 12 wk |
||
Cranial irradiation (2,000 cGy) |
▪ |
10 d |
▪ |
▪ |
||
Cytarabine (70 mg/m2) |
▪ |
▪ |
D 1–3, D 15–17 |
▪ |
Risk stratification |
No. of patients (n) |
Cause of induction death |
No. of deaths during induction (N = 16) |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
n |
% |
|||
Pre B-ALL SR |
76 |
Cortical venous thrombosis |
1 |
6.2 |
Pre B-ALL IR |
22 |
Neutropenic sepsis |
1 |
6.2 |
Pre B-ALL HR |
11 |
Fungal pneumonia |
2 |
12.5 |
Neutropenic sepsis |
1 |
6.2 |
||
T-ALL SR |
35 |
Neutropenic sepsis |
1 |
6.2 |
T-ALL HR |
12 |
Hemorrhage |
4 |
25 |
Neutropenic sepsis |
2 |
12.5 |
||
Systemic candidiasis |
1 |
6.2 |
||
Fungal pneumonia |
1 |
6.2 |
||
HIV |
1 |
6.2 |
||
Cortical venous thrombosis |
1 |
6.2 |
Discussion and Conclusion
The 5-year survival rate for ALL in the western world is approximately 90% in children younger than 15 years.[11] Compared to the developed world, the biology of ALL appears different in India, with a higher proportion of T-ALL (20–50% as compared to 10–20% in the developed world), hypodiploidy and translocations t (1;19), t (9;22), and t (4;11). All of these factors contribute to a poorer prognosis of leukemia.[1]
The incidence of induction mortality was higher in the T-ALL HR group; however, the statistical difference in EFS was not significant between pre-B-ALL SR and T-ALL SR groups treated by the MCP841 protocol. The most common cause of induction death was neutropenic sepsis. Factors such as malnutrition contributed to the increased risk of mortality during the induction period. In the randomized intercontinental trial by Starý et al on intensive chemotherapy for childhood ALL by BFM 2002, PGR was reported in 90.2%,[12] while in a study on outcome of ALL with the ALL-BFM-95 protocol in Nepal by Sharma Poudyal et al, PGR was reported in 71.8% patients.[13] In our study, PGR was reported in 62.8% patients. Out of a total of 64 deaths, most occurred due to relapse in the postinduction period (n = 37 [57%] of overall mortality). Bone marrow is the most frequent site of relapse and no CNS relapse was seen. Advani et al obtained similar results for bone marrow relapse, and five patients had a combined bone marrow and CNS relapse.[5] All cases of relapse were advised bone marrow transplant and were referred to institutions with a bone marrow transplant facility. As per the institutional protocol, the cases of relapse were further treated with the St. Jude Protocol and the CCG112 protocol for testicular relapse, but there was no reported survival in cases of relapse in our study.
EFS in our study was 59% at 168 months, which is comparable to the 49
References
- Arora RS, Eden TO, Kapoor G. Epidemiology of childhood cancer in India. Indian J Cancer 2009; 46 (04) 264-273
- Abboud MR, Ghanem K, Muwakkit S. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in low and middle-income countries: disease characteristics and treatment results. Curr Opin Oncol 2014; 26 (06) 650-655
- Arora RS, Arora B. Acute leukemia in children: a review of the current Indian data. South Asian J Cancer 2016; 5 (03) 155-160
- Kulkarni KP, Arora RS, Marwaha RK. Survival outcome of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in India: a resource-limited perspective of more than 40 years. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2011; 33 (06) 475-479
- Advani S, Pai S, Venzon D. et al. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in India: an analysis of prognostic factors using a single treatment regimen. Ann Oncol 1999; 10 (02) 167-176
- Magrath I, Shanta V, Advani S. et al. Treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in countries with limited resources; lessons from use of a single protocol in India over a twenty year period [corrected]. Eur J Cancer 2005; 41 (11) 1570-1583
- Mukhopadhyay A, Gangopadhyay S, Dasgupta S, Paul S, Mukhopadhyay S, Ray UK. Surveillance and expected outcome of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children and adolescents: an experience from Eastern India. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2013; 34 (04) 280-282
- Vaidya SJ, Advani SH, Pai SK. et al. Survival of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of therapy at Tata Memorial Hospital, Bombay, India. Leuk Lymphoma 1996; 20 (3–4): 311-315
- Dördelmann M, Reiter A, Borkhardt A. et al. Prednisone response is the strongest predictor of treatment outcome in infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 1999; 94 (04) 1209-1217
- Kapoor A, Kalwar A, Kumar N, Singhal MK, Beniwal S, Kumar HS. Analysis of outcomes and prognostic factors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients treated by MCP841 protocol: a regional cancer center experience. J Res Med Sci 2016; 21: 15
- Smith MA, Altekruse SF, Adamson PC, Reaman GH, Seibel NL. Declining childhood and adolescent cancer mortality. Cancer 2014; 120 (16) 2497-2506
- Starý J, Zimmermann M, Campbell M. et al. Intensive chemotherapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of the randomized intercontinental trial ALL IC-BFM 2002. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32 (03) 174-184
- Sharma Poudyal B, Paudel B, Tuladhar S, Neupane S, Bhattarai K, Joshi U. Outcome of ALL with ALL-BFM-95 protocol in Nepal. JCO Glob Oncol 2023; 9: e2200408